But first, I suppose that this is as
good a time as any to evade the question of why I wish to walk the
entire length of that pipeline from the dam into town.
It seems to me that through human
history, humankind, including the greatest thinkers it has produced,
has wasted a grand amount of time grappling with the question
“why?” The question “why?” always involves metaphysical
implications. It has therefore always been and ever shall be moot no
matter how many different deities humankind invents in an attempt to
answer the question.
There is no profit whatsoever in
asking, “Why does the Sun rise in the east?” There is profit, however, in asking the question, “How does the Sun rise in
the east?”
The meaningful contribution of the
Existentialist thinkers of the forties and fifties in the last
century was in suggesting that we abandon the why questions entirely
and concentrate instead on how. Existentialism is out of fashion for
reasons that no one has adequately explained to me. I suspect that it
is because its leading exponent, Jean-Paul Sartre, is now revealed to
us as having been a complete asshole in his personal life. (I have
checked on how Google is going to translate “asshole” for my
Spanish-speaking visitors even though I suspect that most will be
perfectly familiar with the English epithet “asshole.” Let us
just say cabrón for the benefit of those few who are not and call it
good.)
Or it could be that Existentialism
acquired a bad name because it was embraced by so many beatniks,
hipsters, and other ne'er-do-wells who contributed absolutely nothing
to the growth of the global consumer economy from which we all
benefit so enormously today. Whatever the case, Existentialism needs
to be revisited because there is fruit in the middle of it.
With that, let me turn to the proper
question, “How do I intend to walk the pipeline?” One of the
great thinkers of our own time, Martha Stewart, teaches us to strive
for elegance in all things. Therefore, it is my intention to walk
that pipeline as elegantly as possible.
If one gets off the pipeline where I last left you and walks along the rim of the canyon clear down to where the pipeline begins its descent into town, one finds that it makes a turn and goes through a cut.
There is an important reason that I wanted to show you this, but I have forgotten what that reason is.
[Later Addendum: As I vaguely recall now, I think that it had something to do with the psychosexual aspect of this whole pipeline thing.]
[Later Addendum: As I vaguely recall now, I think that it had something to do with the psychosexual aspect of this whole pipeline thing.]


2 comments:
Well, there's always Camus. He wasn't so bad. Will you be dressed elegantly as well? Martha would be proud.
Leave it to you, Bloggerboy, to bring up one of my heroes in this context. It seems to me that my endeavor here is perfectly consistent with Camus' revelation of life's absurdity.
Post a Comment